Penn v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al
Todd Charles Penn |
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. and Jason Bergtold |
2:2017cv10862 |
March 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Oakland |
Matthew F. Leitman |
R. Steven Whalen |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 AMENDED JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Jason Bergtold's 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 44 ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment: (Supplemental Briefs due by 3/22/2019.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 29 ORDER (1) Denying Without Prejudice Defendant Bed Bath and Beyond, Inc.'s 25 Motion for Summary Judgment, and (2) Terminating as Moot Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Extend Time to File a Response. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 26 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 13 ORDER to Attend Scheduling Conference and Notice of Requirements for Submission of Discovery Plan. (Scheduling Conference set for 5/23/2017 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.