Davis et al v. Detroit Downtown Development Authority et al
| Robert Davis and D. Etta Wilcoxon |
| Detroit Downtown Development Authority, Detroit Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, Mike Duggan, Thomas Lewand, Eric Sabree, Christa McClellan and Detroit City Council |
| 2:2017cv11742 |
| June 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Mark A. Goldsmith |
| David R. Grand |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
OPINION AND ORDER Granting 140 Defendants' Motion Reporting Outcome of Discovery to Court and Requesting Additional Sanctions for Contempt. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
138
OPINION & ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Counsel's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defense Counsel Should not be Held in Civil Contempt (Dkt. 133 ). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing
107
OPINION & ORDER Imposing Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION and ORDER (1) Granting in Part Defendants' Second Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 34 ); (2) Granting in Part Defendants' Amended Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 77 ); (3) Denying Defendants' Joint Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 23 ); (4) Denying Defendants' Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (Dkt. 76 ); And (5) Denying Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. 83 ). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (MarW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
