Taylor v. Corizon Medical Corporation et al
Maurice Taylor |
Corizon Medical Corporation and The Michigan Department of Corrections |
2:2017cv12271 |
July 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Lapeer |
David M. Lawson |
Anthony P. Patti |
Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER Adopting 58 Report and Recommendation Granting 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by Corizon Medical Corporation, Dismissing Complaint and Denying 59 Motion for Monetary Award filed by Maurice Taylor. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 52 ORDER 49 Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying 24 Motion to Expedite and 34 Motion for Injunctive Relief filed by Maurice Taylor. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 48 STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER GRANTING 30 Motion to Compel and Directing Parties--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) |
Filing 46 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's as moot 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) |
Filing 44 ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation and granting 17 Motion to dismiss. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DPer) |
Filing 42 ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING REQUEST FOR RECRUITMENT OF COUNSEL--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) |
Filing 40 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Default Judgment--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.