Rouse et al v. Michigan, State of et al
| Arthur Rouse, Lance Goldman, Chris Harner, William Merriman, Cedric Simpson, Frank Doyle, Robert Wilburn, John Does and Jane Does |
| Michigan, State of, Snyder, Donald Trump, State Congress and Federal Congress |
| 2:2017cv12276 |
| July 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Jackson |
| David R. Grand |
| Denise Page Hood |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
OPINION and ORDER Denying the Motion to Amend the Complaint 29 and Denying as Moot the Motion to Stay the Notice of Appeal, but Granting the Motion for Enlargement of Time 30 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION and ORDER Denying the Motions for Rehearing 20 , 22 , the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs on Appeal 23 and the Motion for Release on Habeas 25 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing the Complaint 1 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing Without Prejudice the Joint Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Overruling the Objections to the Deficiency Orders, and Granting Plaintiffs a Thirty Day Extension to Correct the Deficiencies. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
