Bank of America, N.A. v. M Rashid Holdings, LLC et al
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| M Rashid Holdings, LLC and Mashiyat Rashid |
| 2:2017cv13068 |
| September 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Denise Page Hood |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER (A) Authorizing Sale of the Real Property Located at 2990 West Grand Blvd., Detroit Michigan Free and Clear of Liens, Claims Liabilities, Encumbrances and Other Interests; and (B) Granting Other Relief Related to the Foregoing signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (Grimes, K.)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 45 MOTION of Summary Judgment and Entry of JUDGMENT in favor of Bank of America. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Denying Motion for Entry of Orders Approving (1) Bidding Procedures, (11) Sale of Real Property Located at 2990 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan, Free and Clear of Liens, Claims, Encumbrances and Interest With Encumbrances Attaching to the Sale Proceeds, and (111) Related Relief 35 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Appointment of Receiver and 8 Motion for Expedited Hearing. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
