Heard v. Strange et al
Lamont Heard |
Yarnice Strange and Shannon Kyle |
2:2017cv13904 |
December 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Jackson |
Nancy G. Edmunds |
Patricia T. Morris |
Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 ORDER rejecting in part and accepting in part 110 Report and Recommendation; denying 105 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 104 OPINION and ORDER Accepting and Adopting 101 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Granting in Part and Denying in Part 96 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 78 ORDER Denying 74 Motion for Reconsideration re 72 Opinion & Order - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 73 ORDER Denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 61 OPINION and ORDER Accepting and Adopting 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 43 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 28 OPINION and ORDER Accepting 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Denying 16 MOTION to Dismiss, Denying 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) (Main Document 28 replaced on 8/31/2018) (LBar). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.