Sukari v. Akebono Brake Corporation
Plaintiff: Dima Sukari
Defendant: Akebono Brake Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018cv10987
Filed: March 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Nancy G. Edmunds
Presiding Judge: Mona K. Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 754
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION and ORDER Granting 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Dismissing as Moot 45 MOTION for Sanctions - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sukari v. Akebono Brake Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dima Sukari
Represented By: Jack W. Schulz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Akebono Brake Corporation
Represented By: Robert Nathan Dare
Represented By: Anne-Marie Vercruysse Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?