Roberts v. Rewerts
Petitioner: Johnny Wilson Roberts, Jr.
Respondent: Randee Rewerts
Case Number: 2:2018cv12033
Filed: June 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Montcalm
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Johnny Wilson Roberts, Jr. (NAhm)
June 28, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Johnny Wilson Roberts, Jr against Randee Rewerts. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (NAhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Rewerts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnny Wilson Roberts, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randee Rewerts
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?