Shadley v. Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company
| Terry Shadley |
| Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv12275 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| David R. Grand |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from Michigan Eastern has been opened in DISTRICT OF ARIZONA as case 2:18-cv-02804, filed 09/06/2018. (VLun) |
| Case transferred to District of Arizona. (VLun) |
Filing 8
STIPULATED ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the District of Arizona. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (DPer)
|
|
Filing 7
Stipulated Order Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua L Zeman on behalf of All Defendants. (Zeman, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Hartford Life, Inc., Corporate Parent Hartford Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company. (Downey, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian P. Downey on behalf of Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company. (Downey, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company served on 7/24/2018, answer due 8/14/2018. (Roeschke, Kiel) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company* (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Terry Shadley against Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6825895 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Maricopa - County Where Action Arose: Maricopa - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Roeschke, Kiel) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shadley v. Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terry Shadley | |
| Represented By: | Kiel J. Roeschke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Accident and Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Brian P. Downey |
| Represented By: | Joshua L Zeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
