Kogin v. Wickersham
Plaintiff: Emmy-Jo Kogin
Defendant: Anthony M. Wickersham and Robert J. Crothers
Case Number: 2:2018cv12475
Filed: August 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Avern Cohn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Filing 10 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Emmy-Jo Kogin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Unpublished Case Cited, #2 Exhibit 2-Unpublished Case Cited, #3 Exhibit 3-Unpublished Case Cited, #4 Exhibit 4-Unpublished Case Cited) (Vocht, Michelle)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO ANSWER DEFENDANTSMOTION TO DISMISS Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
September 11, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Anthony M. Wickersham. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1) (Schapka, John)
September 11, 2018 Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: John A. Schapka appearing on behalf of Anthony M. Wickersham (Schapka, John)
August 23, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Robert J. Crothers served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018. (Vocht, Michelle)
August 23, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Anthony M. Wickersham served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018. (Vocht, Michelle)
August 9, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lynn H. Shecter on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Shecter, Lynn)
August 9, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Anthony M. Wickersham* (NAhm)
August 9, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Robert J. Crothers* (NAhm)
August 9, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Emmy-Jo Kogin against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6853994 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Port Huron - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Possible companion case(s): Macomb County Circuit Court, 2018-002067-NZ, Judge Servitto] (Vocht, Michelle)
August 9, 2018 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kogin v. Wickersham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony M. Wickersham
Represented By: John A. Schapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert J. Crothers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emmy-Jo Kogin
Represented By: Lynn H. Shecter
Represented By: Michelle E. Vocht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?