Smith v. Midwest Supply & Maintenance Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wanda Smith
Defendant: Midwest Supply & Maintenance Company, Inc. and Charlotte Callagham
Case Number: 2:2018cv12483
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: Sean F Cox
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2018 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Yaldou, Bryan)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Charlotte Callagham, Midwest Supply & Maintenance Company, Inc.* (SSch)
August 15, 2018 FILING FEE Received in the amount of 400.00 by Wanda Smith - Receipt No. DET116077 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan)
August 10, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit B - Proposed Notice & Consent, #4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Plaintiff Smith, #5 Exhibit D - Barber v CL WILLIAMS Transcript of Hearing on Mtion for Conditional Certification, #6 Exhibit E - Barber v CL WILLIAMS Order Certifying Collective, #7 Exhibit F - Bunyan v Spectrum Brands, #8 Exhibit G - Crawford v Lexington- Fayette Urban County Gov't, #9 Exhibit H - Flexter v Action Temporary, #10 Exhibit I - Frye v Baptist Mem'l, #11 Exhibit J - LaFleur v Dollar Tree Stores, #12 Exhibit K - Lankford v CWL Invs, #13 Exhibit L - Lee v Gab Telecom, #14 Exhibit M - Lewis v Chow Time, #15 Exhibit N - Lynch v Dining Concepts Grp, #16 Exhibit O - Phelps v MC Commc'ns, #17 Exhibit P - Ritz v Mike Rory Corp, #18 Exhibit Q - Robinson v Roberts Hotels, #19 Exhibit R - Shabazz v Asurion, #20 Exhibit S - Shipes v Amurcon, #21 Exhibit T - Smith v Lowe's, #22 Exhibit U - Taylor v Pittsburgh Mercy) (Yaldou, Bryan)
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 CONSENT to Sue by All Plaintiffs (Yaldou, Bryan)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 8/17/2018 (NAhm)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Plaintiff Wanda Smith) (Yaldou, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Midwest Supply & Maintenance Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midwest Supply & Maintenance Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlotte Callagham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Smith
Represented By: Bryan Yaldou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?