Lanzon v. State of Michigan, County of Livingston et al
| Daryl-Christopher Lanzon |
| State of Michigan, County of Livingston, State of Michigan 44th Judicial Court, Honorable Michael P. Hatty, Angela Del Vero, Shawn M. Ryan, Angela Delvero, Miriam A. Cavanaugh, William J. Vailliencourt, Jr., Pamela J. Mass, Suzanne Gettis, Jerry D. Sherwood, Jr. and David J Reader |
| 2:2018cv12641 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Anthony P Patti |
| George Caram Steeh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT in favor of defendants Entered by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting application to proceed In forma Pauperis #2 and DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Daryl-Christopher Lanzon against Miriam A. Cavanaugh, David J Reader, Suzanne Gettis, Jerry D. Sherwood, Jr, William J. Vailliencourt, Jr, Pamela J. Mass, Angela Delvero, Shawn M. Ryan. (DAll) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Daryl-Christopher Lanzon. (SOso) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daryl-Christopher Lanzon against All Defendants (SOso) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
