Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated v. Dunn Paper, Inc.
| Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated |
| Dunn Paper, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv12800 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT re #8 MOTION for Order For Waiver of Obligation for Local Counsel Pursuant to LR83.20 (f) (1) (Certification in Support of Motion by Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated (Fiorilla, John) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order For Waiver of Obligation for Local Counsel Pursuant to LR83.20 (f) (1) by Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated. (Fiorilla, John) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III: Scheduling Conference held on 10/31/2018. (Court Reporter: Rob Smith) (DPar) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/31/2019, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 4/30/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Stephen J. Murphy III, Bench Trial set for 10/8/2019 09:00 AM before District Judge Stephen J. Murphy III. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (Refer to image for additional dates) (DPar)
|
| Filing 6 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Fletcher, Gary) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Joint Discovery Plan and Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, (Scheduling Conference set for 10/31/2018 09:30 AM before District Judge Stephen J. Murphy III). Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Dunn Paper, Inc.. (Fletcher, Gary) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Dunn Paper, Inc.* (SKra) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated (Fiorilla, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated against Dunn Paper, Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6896455 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: St Clair - County of 1st Defendant: St Clair. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Fiorilla, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated v. Dunn Paper, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dunn Paper, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gary A. Fletcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | John K. Fiorilla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
