Russell v. American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana
| Richard C. Russell |
| American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana |
| 2:2018cv13043 |
| September 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Answer/Respond to Complaint. Response due by 11/30/2018 Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED by All Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Ex A - Career Contract, #3 Exhibit Ex B - Amendment, #4 Exhibit Ex C - Career Amendment, #5 Exhibit Ex D - Memo, #6 Exhibit Ex E - Termination, #7 Exhibit Ex F - Text, #8 Exhibit Ex G - 3/2/18 letter, #9 Exhibit Ex H - Appreciation) (Kifferstein, Warren) |
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order on Warren M. Kifferstein for Richard C. Russell at 38533 Woodward Ave. suite 170, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304. (CPin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)
|
| Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana (Matthews, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana. (Matthews, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Counts III and IV by American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana. (Matthews, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 2018-168112-CK. Receipt No: 0645-6924442 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Matthews, Aaron) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russell v. American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard C. Russell | |
| Represented By: | Warren M. Kifferstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana | |
| Represented By: | Aaron O. Matthews |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
