Ardis v. Polavarapu
Plaintiff: Kenneth Foster Ardis
Defendant: Ravindra Polavarapu
Case Number: 2:2018cv13264
Filed: October 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Bernard A Friedman
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Filing 11 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing the #1 Complaint, denying as moot plaintiff's #8 application to proceed in forma pauperis and #9 motion for substituted service and plaintiff may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, as any appeal from this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
November 28, 2018 TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Opinion & Order, #11 Judgment on Kenneth Foster Ardis Pris. No. 191278 Chippewa (MSP), Chippewa Correctional Facility, 4269 W M-80, Kincheloe, MI 49784 (JCur)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $0 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DAll)
November 15, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Substitute of Service by Kenneth Foster Ardis. (SSch)
November 15, 2018 Filing 8 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Kenneth Foster Ardis. (SSch)
November 15, 2018 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kenneth Foster Ardis against Ravindra Polavarapu. (SSch)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 11/26/2018 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm)
October 24, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Mediation Program (DAll)
October 18, 2018 Filing 4 Docket Sheet from Michigan Western; Case Number 2:18-cv-00152.
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) [Transferred from miwd on 10/18/2018.]
October 18, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Kenneth Foster Ardis #191278; (mlc) [Transferred from miwd on 10/18/2018.] Modified on 10/18/2018 (VLun).
October 18, 2018 Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Ravindra Polavarapu filed by Kenneth Foster Ardis #191278 (mlc) [Transferred from Michigan Western; Case Number 2:18-cv-00152]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ardis v. Polavarapu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Foster Ardis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ravindra Polavarapu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?