Lipian v. University of Michigan et al
| Andrew Lipian |
| University of Michigan and David Daniels |
| 2:2018cv13321 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Arthur J Tarnow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Gordon, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 17
COUNTERCLAIM filed by David Daniels against Andrew Lipian (Stacey, Francyne)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by David Daniels. (Stacey, Francyne)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by University of Michigan. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1. Unpublished Case Law) (Schwartz, Brian)
|
|
Filing 14
SECOND STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for University of Michigan to File Response to #6 Amended Complaint. Response due by 12/6/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Response by Defendant David Daniels to #6 Amended Complaint. Response due by 12/14/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant University of Michigan to File Response to #6 Amended Complaint. Response due by 12/3/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Daniels to File Response to #6 Amended Complaint. Response due by 12/7/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Francyne B. Stacey on behalf of David Daniels. (Stacey, Francyne)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. David Daniels served on 11/6/2018, answer due 11/27/2018. (Gordon, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Schwartz on behalf of University of Michigan. (Schwartz, Brian)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. University of Michigan served on 11/1/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Gordon, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Andrew Lipian against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Gordon, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti to Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. David Daniels served on 10/25/2018, answer due 11/15/2018. (Gordon, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *University of Michigan* (LGra)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *David Daniels* (LGra)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Andrew Lipian against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6960642 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Gordon, Deborah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
