Penfound et al
| Jill L. Penfound and John S. Penfound |
| David Wm Ruskin |
| 2:2018cv13333 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Avern Cohn |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Brief in Support filed by David Wm Ruskin. (DeCarlo, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Brief in Support filed by Jill L. Penfound, John S. Penfound. (Scheinfield, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO APPELLEES MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by David Wm Ruskin (DeCarlo, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Brief in Support by David Wm Ruskin. (DeCarlo, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Designated Bankruptcy Record (VLun) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of Receipt of Complete Record on Appeal (VLun) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal (VLun) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT filed by Jill L. Penfound, John S. Penfound, Bankruptcy Court case number 18-48940. (VLun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
