Niksa et al v. CVS Health et al
Plaintiff: Aaron M. Niksa and Nicole A. Niksa
Defendant: Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC and CVS Health
Case Number: 2:2018cv13419
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Stephanie Dawkins Davis
Referring Judge: Denise Page Hood
2 Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
December 17, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendants w/o Prejudice by All Plaintiffs (McHugh, Thomas)
November 19, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 1/7/2019 10:00 AM before District Judge Denise Page Hood (LSau)
November 14, 2018 Filing 7 REPLY To Defendants' Affirmative Defenses by All Plaintiffs. (McHugh, Thomas)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Response to Complaint. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
November 8, 2018 Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Defendants (Chandler, Cheryl)
November 8, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Chandler, Cheryl)
November 8, 2018 Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Defendants identifying Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation for CVS Health, Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC. (Chandler, Cheryl)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER of DISQUALIFICATION and REASSIGNING CASE from Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (SSch)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants CVS Health and Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC, d/b/a CVS/Pharmacy #8144 from Macomb County, case number 2018-003805-NH. Receipt No: 0645-6972606 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Chandler, Cheryl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Niksa et al v. CVS Health et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC
Represented By: Cheryl L. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Health
Represented By: Cheryl L. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron M. Niksa
Represented By: Thomas G. McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole A. Niksa
Represented By: Thomas G. McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?