Gennarilli v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Anthony Gennarilli
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv13581
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Gershwin A Drain
Referring Judge: Mona K Majzoub
2 Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
3 Judge: Arthur J Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Anthony Gennarilli (Weaver, Lesley)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff's Counsel to Serve a Copy of the Instant Order on Plaintiff and Requiring Plaintiff to Attend Status Conference on 3/15/19 re #7 Notice to Appear. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
March 4, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 3/15/2019 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Plaintiff(s) to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Show Cause Response due by 2/27/2019 Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney Jaye Quadrozzi by Anthony Gennarilli. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Proposed Order) (Quadrozzi, Jaye)
December 7, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company Regarding Filed Motion to Consolidate Cases for All Purposes and for Ordered Filing of an Amended Consolidated Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 2 - Filed Motion to Consolidate) (Douglas, Stephanie)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow and Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub to District Judge Gershwin A. Drain and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (NAhm)
November 16, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Ford Motor Company* (DPer)
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6994099 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Quadrozzi, Jaye)
November 16, 2018 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gennarilli v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Stephanie A. Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Gennarilli
Represented By: Jaye Quadrozzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?