Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation v. Isselhardt Automotive, LLC et al
Plaintiff:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Isselhardt Automotive, LLC and Tracy Isselhardt
Case Number:
2:2018cv13804
Filed:
December 7, 2018
Court:
Michigan Eastern District Court
0 Judge:
Stephen J Murphy
1 Judge:
Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit:
Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action:
28:1332
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow this docket report by RSS
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| December 7, 2018 | 2 | STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Nissan North America, Inc., Corporate Parent Nissan Motor Co, Ltd., Corporate Parent Renault S.A. for Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation. (Bruinsma, James) |
| December 7, 2018 | 1 | COMPLAINT VERIFIED filed by All Plaintiffs against Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7020618 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Jackson - County of 1st Defendant: Jackson. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Wholesale Financing Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Financing Statement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C Guaranty, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D Demand, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E Schedule of Vehicles) (Bruinsma, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
