Crestmark v. Hooven-Dayton Corp. et al
| Crestmark |
| Che International Group, LLC and Hooven-Dayton Corp. |
| 2:2018cv13831 |
| December 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF DENIAL of Clerk's Entry of Default JUDGMENT as to *Che International Group, LLC, Hooven-Dayton Corp.*. Reason: *The sum certain amount could not be made certain by computation by the Clerk.* (DPer) |
| Filing 19 REQUEST for Clerk's Entry of Judgment by Default with Affidavit of Sum Certain as to Hooven-Dayton Corp. in the amount of $ 1,025,727 by Crestmark. (Rose, James) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST for Clerk's Entry of Judgment by Default with Affidavit of Sum Certain as to Che International Group, LLC in the amount of $ 1,025,727 by Crestmark. (Rose, James) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #16 Clerks Entry of Default, #15 Clerks Entry of Default by Crestmark (Rose, James) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Hooven-Dayton Corp.* (LGra) |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Che International Group, LLC* (LGra) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Correction re #13 Clerks Entry of Default. (LGra) |
| Filing 13 [DOCKETING ERROR] CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Crestmark* (LGra) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to All Defendants by Crestmark. (Rose, James) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Hooven-Dayton Corp. served on 12/19/2018, answer due 1/9/2019. (Rose, James) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Che International Group, LLC served on 12/19/2018, answer due 1/9/2019. (Rose, James) |
Filing 9
Order Vacating #7 Order to Show Cause. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Crestmark. (Rose, James) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Crestmark to Show Cause why this Case should not be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 12/27/2018. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Hooven-Dayton Corp.* (SSch) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Che International Group, LLC* (SSch) |
| Filing 4 [DOCKETING ERROR] SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (RBog) Modified on 12/12/2018 (SSch). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 12/18/2018 (DPer) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Crestmark identifying Corporate Parent Meta Financial Group, Inc. for Crestmark. (Rose, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified filed by Crestmark against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A- Loan Agreement, #3 Exhibit B-Promissory Note, #4 Exhibit C-Che Guaranty, #5 Exhibit D-CIG Guaranty, #6 Exhibit E-Notice of Default, #7 Exhibit F-First Forbearance Agreement, #8 Exhibit G-Second Forbearance Agreement, #9 Exhibit H-Surrender Agreement, #10 Exhibit I-Notice of Public UCC Foreclosure Sale) (Rose, James) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of $400.00 by Crestmark - Receipt No. DET118879 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
