Walls v. Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV) et al
Alisha M. Walls |
MDOC Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV), Michigan Department of Civil Service Office of the State Employer, Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV) and Michigan Disability Management Unit |
2:2018cv13903 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Stephen J Murphy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Certificate of Service re #7 Notice of Appeal. (DPer) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Alisha M. Walls re #4 Order. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (DPer) |
Filing 6 Letter from Alisha M. Walls [Originally filed in 16-13292] (SSch) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, #5 Judgment on Alisha M. Walls at 5586 Cary Drive, Ypsilanti, MI 48197. (DPar) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Alisha M. Walls. (DPer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alisha M. Walls against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.