Staffney v. Campbell
| Harold Staffney |
| Michigan Department of Correction and Sherman Campbell |
| 2:2018cv13922 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Approved by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Harold Staffney. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DAll)
|
| Filing 4 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Harold Staffney; with prison account statement. (DPer) |
| Deficiency Corrected re #2 Order. (DPer) |
| Filing 3 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 1/18/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (LGra)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Harold Staffney against Michigan Department of Correction. (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
