Centurylink Communications, LLC et al v. Bullseye Telecom, Inc.
| Level 3 Communications, LLC, Wiltel Communications, Centurylink Communications, LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. |
| Bullseye Telecom, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv14020 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs , NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Steese, Charles) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Plaintiffs to Show Cause why the Court should not dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, (Show Cause Response due by 1/8/2019). Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Bullseye Telecom, Inc.* (ATee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Bullseye Telecom, Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7042111 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Denver County, Colorado - County Where Action Arose: Oakland County, Michigan - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland County, Michigan. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Coversheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Steese, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
