United States of America v. Fata
| United States of America |
| Farid Fata |
| Samar Fata |
| 2:2018mc51655 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Paul D Borman |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response re #6 MOTION to Set Aside Restraining Order filed by Samar Fata. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - example of account opening signature page) (Falcone, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Set Aside Restraining Order by Samar Fata. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Adamson opinion) (Falcone, Joseph) |
Filing 5
ORDER to Strike 1 INITIATING MOTION Set aside restraining order by Samar Fata. Receipt No: 0645-7001858 - Fee: 47 dollars filed by Samar Fata, 4 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Samar Fata. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE to 1 INITIATING MOTION Set aside restraining order by Samar Fata. Receipt No: 0645-7001858 - Fee: 47 dollars filed by United States of America. (Hotz, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 2 INDEX of Exhibits re 1 INITIATING MOTION Set aside restraining order by Samar Fata. Receipt No: 0645-7001858 - Fee: 47 dollars by Samar Fata (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Adamson opinion) (Falcone, Joseph) |
| [RELATED to case 13-20600; Dft. #1] (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
