Diaz v. Russo Canada ULC et al
Kathryn Diaz |
RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT, RUSSO CANADA INC, Russo Canada ULC and Unknown Driver |
2:2019cv10080 |
January 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Denise Page Hood |
Anthony P Patti |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1364 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 3/25/2019 10:45 AM before District Judge Denise Page Hood (LSau) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT of withdrawal of #6 MOTION to Dismiss . (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood re #9 Stipulation of Dismissal as to RUSSO CANADA INC, ONLY. (Grimes, K.) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal for Russo Canada, Inc. by RUSSO CANADA INC, RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT, Russo Canada ULC (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 8 [STRICKEN] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Russo Canada ULC Interrogatories and Request for Production (Rice, Andrew) Modified on 2/1/2019 (SOso). |
NOTICE of Error directed to: Andrew P. Rice re #8 Certificate of Service. Document is prohibited discovery, disclosure or a certificate of service thereof. Document was stricken. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SOso) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF HEARING on #6 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 3/13/2019 04:00 PM before District Judge Denise Page Hood (LSau) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by RUSSO CANADA INC, RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT, Russo Canada ULC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by RUSSO CANADA INC, RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT, Russo Canada ULC. (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by RUSSO CANADA INC (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Russo Canada ULC (Rice, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew P. Rice on behalf of RUSSO CANADA INC, RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT, Russo Canada ULC. (Rice, Andrew) |
Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant Unknown Driver. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Notice of Removal, (Rice, Andrew) |
NOTICE of error directed to Andrew P. Rice re #1 Notice of removal. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. Party John Doe (Unknown Driver) needs to be added as a defendant. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Wayne County, Michigan, case number 2018-013324-NI. Receipt No: 0645-7058982 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Rice, Andrew) |
NOTICE of Error directed to: Andrew P. Rice re #1 Notice of Removal,. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SOso) |
Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant RUSSO CANADA ULC DBA RCT. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing Notice of Error, #1 Notice of Removal, (Rice, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.