Wadell v Commissioner of Social Security
| Shari Lynn Wadell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2019cv10444 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING #10 Stipulation filed by Shari Lynn Wadell. Pursuant to R11 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, proposed orders must be submitted via the link located under the Utilities section of ECF. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (THal)
|
| Filing 10 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION by Shari Lynn Wadell (Clayton, Kenneth) Modified on 3/13/2019 (THal). |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney General served on 2/27/2019. (Clayton, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/28/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. (Clayton, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Luis A. Pere on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Pere, Luis) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Regional Chief Counsel. (Clayton, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT by Shari Lynn Wadell (Clayton, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Commissioner of Social Security* (LGra) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Referral of Social Security Case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (LGra) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Shari Lynn Wadell against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7109154 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Clayton, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 [COMPLAINT] AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Commissioner of Social Security. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Clayton, Kenneth) Modified on 2/14/2019 (LGra). |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wadell v Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shari Lynn Wadell | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth D. Clayton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Luis A. Pere |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
