Corsini v. City of Hazel Park et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Corsini
Defendant: City of Hazel Park, Edward M Lichten and Edward Lichten, MD PC
Case Number: 2:2019cv10627
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Bernard A Friedman
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by City of Hazel Park. (Klemptner, Daniel)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura S. Amtsbuechler on behalf of City of Hazel Park. (Amtsbuechler, Laura)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Daniel A. Klemptner on behalf of City of Hazel Park., NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A. Klemptner on behalf of City of Hazel Park. (Klemptner, Daniel)
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *City of Hazel Park, Edward Lichten, MD PC, Edward M Lichten* (SSch)
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order FILING FEE Received in the amount of $400.00 by Kevin Corsini - Receipt No. DET120922 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 3/12/2019 (SOso)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SOso)
March 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kevin Corsini against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Burg, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Corsini v. City of Hazel Park et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hazel Park
Represented By: Daniel A. Klemptner
Represented By: Laura S. Amtsbuechler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward M Lichten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Lichten, MD PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Corsini
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Burg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?