Arnold et al v. State of Michigan 46th Judicial District et al
Ernestine Arnold Private Religious Trust and Ernestine Arnold |
Renee Shelide, State of Michigan 46th Judicial District, Southfield Holdings, LLC, Tajuana Watts, Marc D. Landau and Cynthia M. Arvant |
2:2019cv10653 |
March 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Denise Page Hood |
Contract: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Certificate of Service re #7 Notice of Appeal. (ATee) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL by Ernestine Arnold re #6 Judgment, #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (ATee) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER Granting Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 and Dismissing Plaintiff's Cause of Action. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Ernestine Arnold at 22701 Essex Way, #631, Southfield, MI 48033. (LSau) |
Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for order to stop eviction by Ernestine Arnold. (DPer) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Ernestine Arnold. (DPer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ernestine Arnold Private Religious Trust, Ernestine Arnold against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.