Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Bombardier

Plaintiff: Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Defendant: Daniel Bombardier
Case Number: 2:2019cv10951
Filed: March 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Anthony P Patti
Referring Judge: George Caram Steeh
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mercedes Benz USA LLC against Daniel Bombardier. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7176625 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: New Castle, Delaware - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Not a U.S Resident. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (DeFranco, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Bombardier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Represented By: Edward J. DeFranco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Bombardier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?