Missilmani v. Shiraz
Mustapha Missilmani |
Abbas Ali Shiraz and Abbas Ali Shirazi |
2:2019cv11408 |
May 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
George Caram Steeh |
R Steven Whalen |
Other Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER from Abbas Ali Shirazi (DPer) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Mustapha Missilmani re #3 Summons Issued Proof of Service on Abbas Ali Shirazi (Abood, Norman) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Abbas Ali Shiraz* (SOso) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SOso) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Abbas Ali Shirazi filed by Mustapha Missilmani against Abbas Ali Shiraz. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Amended Summons) (Abood, Norman) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Deman filed by Mustapha Missilmani against Abbas Ali Shiraz. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7236381 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: USA - County Where Action Arose: USA - County of 1st Defendant: Lebanon. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons) (Abood, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.