Michigan CRNA's Staffing, LLC et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
| Detroit Anesthesia Group, PLLC and Michigan CRNA's Staffing, LLC |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| 2:2019cv11605 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| R Steven Whalen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants and Joinder with Case of Trivly Dobbins v Greyhound Lines, Inc. Case No. 19-cv-10546 from 44th Judicial District Court, case number 19-01477GC. Receipt No: 0645-7262564 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, 19-cv-10546, Judge Paul D. Borman] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A-Trivly Dobbins Complaint, #3 Exhibit B-CT Corp Service of Process (TD Comp), #4 Exhibit C- MI CRNA's Complaint, #5 Exhibit D-CSC Service of Process (MI CRNA Comp)) (Shreve, Mark) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
