Bullis v. Kullman et al
Jordan Joseph Bullis |
K. Kullman and Macomb County Jail |
2:2019cv11724 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 COPY of #5 Opinion and order and #6 Judgment mailed to Jordan Joseph Bullis and returned as undeliverable (DPer) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (BSau) |
Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing Civil Rights Complaint #1 and Ordering that any Appeal taken by Plaintiff would not be done in good faith. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (BSau) ). |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Opinion & Order on Jordan Joseph Bullis 374515 at MACOMB COUNTY JAIL, P.O. BOX 2308, MT. CLEMENS, MI 48043. (BSau) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $0 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DAll) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Mediation Program (DAll) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Jordan Joseph Bullis. (DAll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jordan Joseph Bullis against K. Kullman, Macomb County Jail (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.