Dawson et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Dustin Dawson and Rick Shawley |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2019cv11728 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Anthony P Patti |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SSch) |
Filing 18
ORDER of Withdrawal of Attorney Tana Lin. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs to Court of Transfer Order Issued by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order) (Quadrozzi, Jaye) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaye Quadrozzi on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Quadrozzi, Jaye) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Judith E. Levy in Ann Arbor to District Judge Sean F. Cox in Detroit. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan K. Levine on behalf of Dustin Dawson, Rick Shawley. (Levine, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III in Detroit to District Judge Judith E. Levy in Ann Arbor. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE: DISQUALIFICATION and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Robert H. Cleland in Port Huron to District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III in Detroit. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATED ORDER STAYING CASE until the Panel has issued a decision on the Transfer Motion. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Bernard A. Friedman and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen in Detroit to District Judge Robert H. Cleland and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti in Port Huron. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie A. Douglas on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Douglas, Stephanie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan M. McKeever on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (McKeever, Susan) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Ford Motor Company served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (McDevitt, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Lesley E. Weaver appearing on behalf of Dustin Dawson, Rick Shawley (Weaver, Lesley) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Gretchen Freeman Cappio appearing on behalf of Dustin Dawson, Rick Shawley (Cappio, Gretchen) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Ryan Patrick McDevitt appearing on behalf of Dustin Dawson, Rick Shawley (McDevitt, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Tana Lin appearing on behalf of Dustin Dawson, Rick Shawley (Lin, Tana) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Ford Motor Company* (SKra) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT -- CLASS ACTION filed by All Plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7277237 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Lincoln County, Oregon - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne County, Michigan. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Sarko, Lynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
