Martinez v. Caesar KKK Haine Religieusemen et al
Ursula Antonia Martinez |
Children of Sultan religieusmen, Asillian religieusemen, Haine religeuseman and Caesar KKK Hanie Religieusemen |
2:2019cv11816 |
June 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David M Lawson |
Mona K Majzoub |
Constitutional - State Statute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Complete Service Documents and for Service of Process by the US Marshal. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 7 ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 6 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION by Ursula Antonia Martinez (DPer) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Ursula Antonia Martinez against Asillian religieusemen, Caesar KKK Hanie Religieusemen, Children of Sultan religieusmen. (DPer) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Ursula Antonia Martinez. (DPer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ursula Antonia Martinez against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.