Goldman et al v. Winn
Lance Adam Goldman |
Michigan Parole Board, Depart of Corrections and Thomas Winn |
2:2019cv12011 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Laurie J Michelson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of Thomas Winn. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
Filing 7 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 6 ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response due by 1/15/2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DPer) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DPer) |
Filing 4 Order amending case caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DPer) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus and #6 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading on Thomas Winn and Michigan Attorney General (DPer) |
Filing 3 MOTION to waive fees re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Lance Adam Goldman. (LGra) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Lance Adam Goldman. (LGra) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lance Adam Goldman against Depart of Corrections, Michigan Parole Board. (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.