Hoeltzel v. Pillsbury et al
| Mark Franklin Hoeltzel |
| Tom Cargill, Lucas, Jane Roe, Margie Pillsbury, Conners, Chalogianis, Mark Worosz, Maureen Burke and Parviz |
| 2:2019cv12328 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| David M Lawson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge on Mark Franklin Hoeltzel 56366-039, MILAN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. BOX 1000. MILAN, MI 48160. (SPin)
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of 400.00 by Mark Franklin Hoeltzel - Receipt No. DET125008 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 9/9/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Mark Franklin Hoeltzel against Maureen Burke, Tom Cargill, Chalogianis, Conners, Lucas, Parviz, Margie Pillsbury, Jane Roe, Mark Worosz (DAll)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
