Husel v. Trinity Health Corporation et al
| William S. Husel |
| Trinity Health Corporation and Trinity Assurance Limited (CAYMAN) |
| 2:2019cv12478 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| George Caram Steeh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William S. Husel against Trinity Assurance Limited (CAYMAN), Trinity Health Corporation. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7376069 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Franklin - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Physician Employment Agreement, #3 Exhibit Integrated Risk Liability Policy, #4 Exhibit Buffer Layer Liability Policy, #5 Exhibit Excess Integrated Risk Liability Policy, #6 Exhibit High Excess Layer Policy, #7 Exhibit Indictment, #8 Exhibit The Columbus Dispatch article, #9 Exhibit Civil Complaints, #10 Exhibit Reservation of Rights Letter dated 1.29.19, #11 Exhibit Supplemental Reservation of Rights Letter dated 4.15.19, #12 Exhibit Demand Letter dated 7.8.19, #13 Exhibit Second Supplemental Reservation of Rights Letter dated 8.5.19, #14 Exhibit Denial of Coverage for Criminal Indictments Letter dated 8.5.19) (Ford, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
