Murray
Appellee: Safir Law P.L.C.
Appellant: Juannelious Benjamin Murray, Sr.
Case Number: 2:2019cv12613
Filed: September 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal (VLun)
September 5, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT filed by Juannelious Benjamin Murray, Sr, Bankruptcy Court case number 19-43879. This transmittal does not include the following: Bankruptcy Case Cover Sheet. The filing fee was not paid. (VLun)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Safir Law P.L.C.
Represented By: Kathleen H. Klaus
Represented By: Steven M. Wolock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Juannelious Benjamin Murray, Sr.
Represented By: Steven A. Finegood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?