Fink v. Variety FoodServices, Inc.
| Alan Fink |
| Variety FoodServices, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv12685 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| Michael J Hluchaniuk |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER Regarding Telephonic Scheduling Conference ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 11/21/2019 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith). Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Variety FoodServices, Inc. (Tetreau, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Variety FoodServices, Inc.. (Tetreau, Melissa) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATED ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Answer due by 10/25/2019. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (BSau)
|
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Melissa M. Tetreau appearing on behalf of Variety FoodServices, Inc. (Tetreau, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Nathan D. Dupes appearing on behalf of Variety FoodServices, Inc. (Dupes, Nathan) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Regarding Certification Requirements. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Variety FoodServices, Inc. served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. (Batey, Scott) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Variety FoodServices, Inc.* (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alan Fink against Variety FoodServices, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7402270 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Batey, Scott) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fink v. Variety FoodServices, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Variety FoodServices, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nathan D. Dupes |
| Represented By: | Melissa M. Tetreau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alan Fink | |
| Represented By: | Scott P. Batey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
