Ware et al v. Garcia et al
| Valdree Ware and Christopher Ware |
| Salomon Antonio Lopez Garcia and 1808396 Ontario Ltd. |
| 2:2019cv12688 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Arthur J Tarnow |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER: Witnesses to be exchanged by 12/2/2019, Discovery Motions to be filed by 12/31/2019, Discovery due by 1/31/2020, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 2/28/2020, Joint Final Pretrial Order due 6/2/2020, Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/9/2020 02:30 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MLan)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow: Scheduling Conference held on 10/15/2019. (MLan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 10/15/2019 11:00 AM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) Modified on 10/2/2019 (MLan). |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE OF CORRECTION: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 10/15/2019 11:00 AM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Original docket entry indicated conference to be held on 10/16/19. Original docket entry corrected. (MLan) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 1808396 Ontario Ltd., Salomon Antonio Lopez Garcia from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 19-000040-NI. Receipt No: 0645-7402615 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2-Motion for 2nd Summons and Order, #4 Exhibit 3-Status Conference Scheduling Order, #5 Exhibit 4-Defendant Garcia's Answer to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, Jury Demand, #6 Exhibit 5-Appearance for Defendant Garcia, #7 Exhibit 6-Defendant Garcia's Denial & Demand for Specific Recitation re Affirmative Defenses, #8 Exhibit 7-Stipulated Order to Amend Complaint, #9 Exhibit 8-Plaintiffs' 1st Amended Complaint, #10 Exhibit 9-Defendants' Answer, Affirmative Defenses to 1st Amended Complaint, #11 Exhibit 10-Defendants' Jury Demand, #12 Exhibit 11-Defendant 1808396 Denial and Demand for Specific Recitation re Affirmative Defenses, #13 Exhibit 12-Defendant Farm Bureau's Answer to Plaintiffs' 1st Amended Complaint, #14 Exhibit 13-Defendant Farm Bureau Reliance Upon Jury Demand, #15 Exhibit 14-Defendant Farm Bureau Denial & Demand for Specific Recitation re Affirmative Defenses, #16 Exhibit 15-Plaintiffs' Preliminary Witness & Exhibit List, #17 Exhibit 16-Defendant Farm Bureau Lay Witness List, #18 Exhibit 17-Defendant Farm Bureau Expert Witness List, #19 Exhibit 18-Defendants' Witness List, #20 Exhibit 19-Joint Motion to Adjourn Dates to Track #2, #21 Exhibit 20-Notice of Hearing Joint Motion to Adjourn Dates to Track #2, #22 Exhibit 21-Order Granting Motion to Adjourn Dates to Track #2, #23 Exhibit 22-Amended Stipulated Order of Dismissal without Prejudice as to Farm Bureau, #24 Exhibit 23-Defendants' 1st Amended Witness List) (Cook, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
