Matthews v. Detroit Public Schools et al
Plaintiff: Mona Matthews
Defendant: Detroit Public Schools and Kelly Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv13277
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: Mark A Goldsmith
2 Judge: Michael J Hluchaniuk
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Andrew L. Scroggins appearing on behalf of Kelly Services, Inc. (Scroggins, Andrew)
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Detroit Public Schools (Hurks-Hill, Phyllis)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Detroit Public Schools. (Hurks-Hill, Phyllis)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of DISQUALIFICATION and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Paul D. Borman to District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (SSch)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Kelly Services, Inc. (Scroggins, Andrew)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Detroit Public Schools served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Batey, Scott)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Kelly Services, Inc. served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Batey, Scott)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Phyllis L. Hurks-Hill on behalf of Detroit Public Schools. (Hurks-Hill, Phyllis)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Kelly Services, Inc.* (DAll)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Detroit Public Schools* (DAll)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mona Matthews against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7476767 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Batey, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Detroit Public Schools et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detroit Public Schools
Represented By: Phyllis L. Hurks-Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Services, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew L. Scroggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mona Matthews
Represented By: Scott P. Batey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?