Thomas v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC
| Rodrick Thomas |
| Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC |
| 2:2019cv13405 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Paul D Borman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (EBut)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: #16 MOTION to Compel Discovery and Initial Disclosures filed by Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Compel Discovery and Initial Disclosures by Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exs 1 - 2) (Giffen, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 15 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC (Giffen, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, LLC. (Giffen, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT correcting name of Defendant, Enterpise filed by Rodrick Thomas against All Plaintiffs. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Broderick, Matthew) |
|
Filing 12
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER Allowing Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: FACILITATION INFORMATION DUE 6/1/2020; Discovery due by 7/17/2020; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 9/18/2020 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (Refer to image for additional dates) (DTof)
|
|
Filing 10
STIPULATED ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 9 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Giffen, Jaclyn) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 01/17/2020 is Cancelled (DTof) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaclyn R. Giffen on behalf of Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. (Giffen, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO APPEAR: DISCOVERY PLAN DUE 1/16/2020; Scheduling Conference set for 1/17/2020 04:00 PM before District Judge Paul D. Borman *READ ENTIRE NOTICE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION* (DTof) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. (Chichester, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Enterprise Holdings, Inc. answer due 12/9/2019.. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA Sheet re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 19-010697-CZ. Receipt No: 0645-7491387 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Chichester, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
