Thompson v. Chapman
| Carl Frazier Thompson |
| People of State of Michigan and Willis Chapman |
| 2:2019cv13438 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of Willis Chapman. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
| Filing 6 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading on Willis Chapman and the Michigan Attorney General (AFla) |
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response due by 6/1/2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (AFla)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (AFla)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (AFla)
|
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Carl Frazier Thompson. (AFla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Carl Frazier Thompson against People of State of Michigan. (AFla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
