King v. McAleenan et al
| Mr. David King |
| Hon. Kenneth Cuccinelli, Director Michael Klinger and Hon. Kevin McAleenan |
| 2:2019cv13454 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Avern Cohn |
| Nancy G Edmunds |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Avern Cohn to District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds pursuant to Administrative Order 20-ao-003. (SSch) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of Michael Klinger served on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020. (Ozormoor, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Michael Klinger, USCIS Detroit Field Office Director served on 11/29/2019. (Ozormoor, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (LGra) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by David King against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7497572 - Fee: 400 dollars. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: District of Columbia. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Ozormoor, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
