Miller v. Arotech Corporation et al
| Andrew Miller |
| James J Quinn, Lawrence F Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation, Jon B Kutler and Kenneth W Cappell |
| 2:2019cv13508 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Re-Issued for * All Defendants * (NAhm) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (SOso) |
| REQUEST for SUMMONS for Arotech Corporation, Kenneth W Cappell, Lawrence F Hagenbuch, Jon B Kutler, James J Quinn. (Acocelli, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Andrew Miller against Arotech Corporation, Kenneth W Cappell, Lawrence F Hagenbuch, Jon B Kutler, James J Quinn with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7502997 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of Country - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): District of Delaware, 19-cv-02016, Judge Hon. Richard G. Andrews] (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Document Continuation Summons, #3 Document Continuation Summons List) (Acocelli, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
