Bagnasco v. Diversified Plastics, Incorporated
| Thomas Bagnasco |
| Diversified Plastics, Incorporated |
| 2:2019cv13546 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Arthur J Tarnow |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 6/29/2020, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 7/29/2020, Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2020 02:30 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (Refer to image for additional dates) (MLan)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow: Scheduling Conference held on 1/28/2020. (MLan) |
| Filing 8 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Thomas Bagnasco (Raftery, James) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE OF DATE CHANGE: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 1/28/2020 02:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling/Settlement Conference set for 2/20/2020 03:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Limited Reliance Upon and Objection to Jury Demand by Diversified Plastics, Incorporated. (Hearld, Zeth) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Zeth D. Hearld appearing on behalf of Diversified Plastics, Incorporated (Hearld, Zeth) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joseph A. Starr appearing on behalf of Diversified Plastics, Incorporated (Starr, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Diversified Plastics, Incorporated served on 12/10/2019, answer due 12/31/2019. (Raftery, James) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Diversified Plastics, Incorporated* (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand filed by Thomas Bagnasco against Diversified Plastics, Incorporated with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7506562 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Hennepin. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Raftery, James) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bagnasco v. Diversified Plastics, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Diversified Plastics, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Zeth D. Hearld |
| Represented By: | Joseph A. Starr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Bagnasco | |
| Represented By: | James J. Raftery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
