Harlow v. SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION
Crystal Harlow |
SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION |
2:2019cv13568 |
December 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Michael J Hluchaniuk |
Linda V Parker |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 2/27/2020 at 11:30 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker (RLou) |
Filing 12 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION (Nixon, Ronald) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION. (Nixon, Ronald) |
Filing 10 Order Vacating #4 Order to Show Cause. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Crystal Harlow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Shub, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION served on 12/10/2019, answer due 12/31/2019. (Coleman, Gregory) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory F. Coleman on behalf of Crystal Harlow. (Coleman, Gregory) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kevin Laukaitis appearing on behalf of Crystal Harlow (Laukaitis, Kevin) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jonathan Shub appearing on behalf of Crystal Harlow (Shub, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 ORDER to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2019. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION* (NAhm) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Gregory F. Coleman appearing on behalf of Crystal Harlow (Coleman, Gregory) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Crystal Harlow against SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7509541 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland County - County Where Action Arose: Oakland County - County of 1st Defendant: Horry County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Civil Cover Sheet) (Suciu, Nick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harlow v. SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Crystal Harlow | |
Represented By: | Nick Suciu, III |
Represented By: | Kevin Laukaitis |
Represented By: | Gregory F. Coleman |
Represented By: | Jonathan Shub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SIXTH GEAR DISTRIBUTION | |
Represented By: | Ronald S. Nixon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.