Mee v. Curtis
Benjamin Mee and Benjamin Mee [E-Filer] |
Derik Curtis |
2:2019cv13609 |
December 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Michael J Hluchaniuk |
Victoria A Roberts |
Civil Rights: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from U.S. Marshal Service of Receipt of Service of Process Documents. (DPer) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Derik Curtis* (DPer) |
Pro Se E-filing Account Created for Benjamin Mee [E-Filer]. (DPer) |
Filing 5 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Complete Service Documents and for Service of Process by the US Marshal. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and granting request for service by the U.S. Marshal. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, #5 Directing Service by the US Marshal on Benjamin Mee at 23073 Beech, Dearborn, MI 48124. (LVer) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 6 Pro Se Application for E-filing submitted by Benjamin Mee [APPROVED] (DPer) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Benjamin Mee. (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Benjamin Mee against Derik Curtis. (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.