Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. v. Franks Oil King, Inc. et al
| Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. |
| Franks Oil King, Inc., Fadi Hachem a/k/a Frank Hachem, Frank and Franks Oil Center, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv10044 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Gershwin A Drain |
| Michael J Hluchaniuk |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Franks Oil Center, Inc. served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Franks Oil King, Inc. served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Fadi Hachem a/k/a Frank Hachem served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Issued for *Franks Oil Center, Inc.* (LGra)
|
|
NOTICE of Error directed to: Jesse L. Jenike-Godshalk re #1 Complaint,,. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (LGra)
|
|
Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant Franks Oil Center, Inc.. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Complaint,, Plaintiff requests summons issued. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Issued for *Fadi Hachem a/k/a Frank Hachem* (LGra)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Issued for *Franks Oil King, Inc.* (LGra)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
|
|
Filing 5
EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint,, by Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Equipment Loan Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Invoice) (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. identifying Corporate Parent Valvoline Inc. for Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC.. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 3
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. identifying Corporate Parent Valvoline Inc. for Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC.. (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 2
Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Valvoline LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC. against Franks Oil King, Inc., Fadi Hachem a/k/a Frank Hachem with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7551266 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Fayette County, KY - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Civil Cover Sheet) (Jenike-Godshalk, Jesse)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
